Baby hatch.
INTRO
Recently many babies are dying as soon as after birth because of lacking of parents support. Baby hatch which is kind of adoption system for baby is very famous system all over the world. Many countries use this system with many discussing,also Japan. The problem is that if we use this system, baby would be saved. On the other hand people might rely on this system and easily put their baby into baby hatch, as a result some people would regard new life as unimportant. There is two letters which expressed their ideas. Let's think and analysis one by one.
2,WITHHELD
The second letter came from WITHHELD. She used the one story about Japanese fearful accident which is a junior high school student couple made baby and throw it away. From that accident, she gave us question that if there was baby post, what would the couple did. What would that baby be. So she insisted that we use baby post in order to save new life.
Moreover she criticized that strong monitoring agency because we can't prevent things which is acted secretly
MY POINT
I strongly agreed with the idea of Withheld. The idea of Krishna, a strong monitoring
agency,might be good idea, however it seems to be unrealistic. She mentioned that government would carry out her plan, but please think about how long dose it take to carry out that plan. According to Asahi news paper, It takes more than 3 years to carry out a plan. In this 3 years, what would be unwanted-people. Do they have to be killed till new plan will be used. It's so miserable.
One the other hand. If baby post are opened, as Withheld mentioned new life would be cured by baby post. Baby post is realistic because it is easy to carry out. Moreover some people become unexpected pregnant. They may not want to bring their children up, so as a solution, they give their children other who want to children through baby post. I think it is good for everybody. As a conclusion, I agree with baby post.
Recently many babies are dying as soon as after birth because of lacking of parents support. Baby hatch which is kind of adoption system for baby is very famous system all over the world. Many countries use this system with many discussing,also Japan. The problem is that if we use this system, baby would be saved. On the other hand people might rely on this system and easily put their baby into baby hatch, as a result some people would regard new life as unimportant. There is two letters which expressed their ideas. Let's think and analysis one by one.
The first letter came from KRISHNA HAKSAR. She insisted that baby hatch does not help children, When thinking long term. Judging from her vocation she is working with disable people, many of them were abandoned by their real parent's. It is bad for their future. She always insisted that baby post couldn't resolve anything because baby post doesn't prevent people from abandoning their children. As a counter plan, she insisted that government or another agency should treat this problem seriously by using tax as a strong monitoring agency.
2,WITHHELD
The second letter came from WITHHELD. She used the one story about Japanese fearful accident which is a junior high school student couple made baby and throw it away. From that accident, she gave us question that if there was baby post, what would the couple did. What would that baby be. So she insisted that we use baby post in order to save new life.
Moreover she criticized that strong monitoring agency because we can't prevent things which is acted secretly
MY POINT
I strongly agreed with the idea of Withheld. The idea of Krishna, a strong monitoring
agency,might be good idea, however it seems to be unrealistic. She mentioned that government would carry out her plan, but please think about how long dose it take to carry out that plan. According to Asahi news paper, It takes more than 3 years to carry out a plan. In this 3 years, what would be unwanted-people. Do they have to be killed till new plan will be used. It's so miserable.
One the other hand. If baby post are opened, as Withheld mentioned new life would be cured by baby post. Baby post is realistic because it is easy to carry out. Moreover some people become unexpected pregnant. They may not want to bring their children up, so as a solution, they give their children other who want to children through baby post. I think it is good for everybody. As a conclusion, I agree with baby post.
yuji さんの投稿 投稿時:
11:59
4 件のコメント:
checked!
(What do you think "Name Withheld" means?)
Hey!!
I strongly disagree with you!!!!!!
This baby hatch system will ONLY encourage irresponsible parents to give birth to babies more!!
Yeah, this system may save hundreds of babies' lives but what they are saving is not actually babies. It's their parents who are too irresponsible to bring their babies up!!
yurixx
I have different opinion. What if the abandoned baby would find the fact when they get older? What would you feel if you were one of them? In my opinion, it is not Japan's government but parents who are responsible.
I disagree with you. I exactly cannot say baby hatch is not good idea though.
I think it makes people decrease their consciousness how difficult it is to raise babies up.
コメントを投稿
<< ホーム